BOScoin - Ask Me Anything - Other
Written by Yezune Choi, CEO of BOScoin
July 23 2018
Answer questions about other
We tried to provide and cover all questions you’ve submitted. Thank you.
Q1. Why you are choosing to stay in the dark? Why aren’t you attending to big name conferences? Where everyone can see and check the uniqueness of boscoin? Meetups are nice but they are small scale marketing…
|
Q2. Almost all slack members want official boscoin english telegram channel, the top 400 cryptos have official telegram channel. Why the manaent is not taking initiative to manage official english telegram channel .. it is frustrating to managment indifference to such small things.
Can you please create an official english telegram group??? Please swap from slack to telegram! 🙂
|
Q3. When BOS CEO released RIPP this June at the Seoul Meetup, he said, “Of course, when it turned into PF, there’s something else.
And node operating compensation or confirmation reward is not the mechanism required by the settlement protocol of the BOScoin.
Then you’ll be offered a different way. But the basic picture is the same.” (I typed literally.) Does this mean that the reward system is different from white paper 1.0?
|
Q4. I hope that the final 5 billion coins will be maintained. This was an agreement between the investor and the BOScoin, in White Paper 1.
|
Q5. Why did the price of BOScoin go from $6 to $0.08 this year.
|
Answers to Korean questions
-
We provide Korean answers only for Korean questions.
Q3. 이번 6월 밋업동영상을 보면서 최예준대표가 RIPP 발표때(동영상시간 1:03:17초부터) “물론 그게 PF가 됐을때, 그 전하고 다른 부분이 있어요. 노드 운영보상이나 컨펌 리워드 같은 경우에는 보스코인의 컨센서스 프로토콜에서 필요로하는 메카니즘이 아닙니다. 그러면 다른식으로 리워드가 제공될건데요. 그래도 기본적인 그림은 동일한거죠.” 라고 이야기를 했습니다.(글 그대로 타이핑 했습니다.) 그럼 기존의 백서 1.0의 노드 운영에 대한 리워드 기능이 없어진다는건가요?
|
Q4. 코인이 최종적으로 50억개를 유지하기 바랍니다. 이것은 백서1에서의 투자자와 보스코인과의 약속이었습니다.
|
Notice
-
AMA responses will be posted on the homepage between the 21st and the end of the month. There is no exact date they will be posted.
-
Any questions which are repeat questions, not constructive in nature, don’t serve the interests of the broader community, are inappropriate and/or vulgar in nature will not be answered.